cond conditional is used when there are more than two options to handle. All the considerations about “true values” and the evaluation of subexpressions discussed in the previous chapter about
if apply here as well, so if anything is unclear please refer to that chapter.
The general form of a
cond expression is
(cond (clause1) (clause2) ... )
Each clause starts with a test, and if the test succeeds the clause is evaluated and its value returned. The last clause may have the keyword
else instead of a test, and if none of the previous tests succeeds this final else clause is evaluated.
Different Forms of clauses¶
I just wrote that the clauses are evaluated if their test succeeds, but that's a little bit sloppy. Actually there are three different forms of valid clauses, and the evaluation is different in each. The point was mainly that the first successful test determines which clause is responsible for the return value.
The Most Common Form¶
The most common form for each clause is
(test exp1 exp2 ...)
In this case one ore more expressions are evaluated and the value of the last expression is returned as the value of the
#(display (let ((rand (random 100))) (cond ((> rand 50) (display rand) (newline) "Random number is greater than 50") ((< rand 50) (display rand) (newline) "Random number is smaller than 50") (else (display rand) (newline) "Random number equals 50"))))
First we generate a random integer and locally bind it to
rand. In the
cond expression we have three cases, expressed by two tests and an else clause. In each clause three expressions are evaluated, and the third - a literal string - is returned as the value of the
cond expression, which is passed along as the value of the
let expression as well. Note that the
cond expression itself is surrounded by parens as well as each individual clause, but the expressions within the clauses are not.
Another form for the clauses is
If a clause is expressed in this way a successful test will directly return its value, without evaluating further expressions. This is where the concept of “true values” comes into play: if the test returns a value that is considered “true” we can directly use it. In the chapter about retrieval from alists we learned about the
assq procedure that will return either a key-value pair from an association list or
#f if the given key is not present in the alist. This way we can directly return the resulting entry or pass control along to the next clause. The following example creates an alist of colors and then tries to retrieve a color through a
cond expression (in real life we would get the alist from “somewhere” so we don't know which keys it contains):
colors = #`((col-red . ,red) (col-blue . ,blue) (col-yellow . ,yellow)) #(display (cond ((assq 'col-lime colors)) ((assq 'col-darkblue colors)) ((assq 'col-red colors)) (else `(col-black . ,black))))
assq will return
#f for the first two tests because the given keys are not in the
colors alist. However, the third test gives a match with the
'col-red key, therefore the
assq expression evaluates to the pair
(col-red 1.0 0.0 0.0). Since this is a “true” value it is returned as the value of the
cond expression and consequently printed to the console. If none of the tests would succeed the
else clause would create a pair with the same structure as the pairs returned by the other clauses, so anyone using the return value would surely get valid data.
Apply a Procedure to the Test Result¶
A final form for the clauses is
(test => proc)
In this case
proc should be a procedure that takes exactly one argument. If the test returns a true value
proc will be applied to this result. We can use this form to improve our previous example so that it only returns the actual color part of the alist entry:
#(display (cond ((assq 'col-lime colors) => cdr) ((assq 'col-darkblue colors) => cdr) ((assq 'col-red colors) => cdr) (else black)))
We perform the same test as before, but when it returns the pair this pair will be passed to the procedure
cdr which will directly extract the second part of the pair. The
else clause has been adjusted accordingly.
This form is actually a very nice form of ”syntactic sugar” because it greatly simplifies that task. Of course we could get the same result - the color part extracted from the pair - with the other forms as well, but in an unnecessarily complicated way. The relevant clause could for example be written like this:
((assq 'col-red colors) (cdr (assq 'col-red colors)))
Once we know that we're at the right key we can retrieve the value again and pass it along to
car, which seems pretty inefficient. So we can avoid using
assq twice by hooking in a local binding:
((let ((result (assq 'col-red colors))) (if result (cdr result) #f)))
Basically this makes use of the previous form, as the
let expression evaluates to either the color or to
#f. Apart from that hint I leave it to you to dissect this expression as an exercise to repeat the topic of local binding. But honestly,
((assq 'col-red colors) => cdr) is much more elegant, isn't it?